FandMmag.com |

Magazine Article

  


NEW PLASMA CUTTING TECHNOLOGY TAKES CARE OF THE “HOLE” ISSUE
Users of mechanized plasma cutting for plate in the gauge to 1 inch thick range can now benefit from a major technological breakthrough. Advanced engineering has improved plasma bolt hole cutting to produce holes that rival drilled holes and plate laser cut holes – at the speed and operating cost of plasma!

Jim Colt, Hypertherm
"This new process addresses distortion in the holes that result from edge inclusions (dings and divots that make the top and bottom of the holes out of round)."

The new True Hole technology for mild steel produces much better holes than what was previously possible with plasma. The above cut samples show ½ in thick mild steel cut with (left) and without the new technology. The pin fits perfectly in the True Hole sample because the hole is almost perfectly shaped. The hole cut without True Hole is wider at the top than at the bottom, causing the pin to fit poorly.


The rapid growth in plasma cutting during the 1960s-70s was based on its ability to contour cut steel plate with the highest speed in the industry. The best way to improve productivity utilizing similar floor space (as compared to mechanized oxy-fuel cutting operations) was to use the plasma process for cutting plate in the ¼ inch to 1 inch thickness range, with the added benefit of the ability to cut non-ferrous materials such as stainless and aluminum.


Early plasma processes provided high speed but less than perfect cut quality in terms of dross formation (resolidified metal) on the bottom of the cut, as well as cut edge angularity that was acceptable for many, but not all, metal fabrication applications.


Cutting holes for bolts with plasma was a less than acceptable use of this process due to the distortion in the holes in the form of edge inclusions (dings and divots that made the top and bottom of holes out of round). These inclusions could cause stress fractures in high strength applications. The natural taper in the holes (smaller bottom dimension than the top) inherently produced during the process by the lag angle of the plasma jet also created tolerance issues that forced fabricators to perform secondary operations such as reaming or drilling to improve the overall hole quality.


Manufacturers of plasma cutting systems relentlessly pushed the laws of physics to extract the best performance. They reduced cut costs by increasing the life of the torch consumable parts and improving the cut edge angularity and minimizing dross formation. This created more applications for this high speed metal cutting process. Over time, other major improvements in plasma cutting followed:
Oxygen plasma cutting allowed faster speeds at lower power levels and improved edge squareness, dross formation, and improved cut edge metallurgy (better weldability, less edge hardening).
Long Life consumable technology dramatically improved the average “cost per foot” of the plasma cutting process, which was already better than other processes, by allowing the torch consumable parts to last 3 to 6 times longer.
High Definition plasma cutting technology, basically a higher energy density, narrower arc with higher velocity, dramatically improved cut quality through better edge angularity throughout the thickness range of plasma.


The platform that the plasma torch depends on – the CNC cutting machine which controls torch motion – also benefitted from many technological innovations:
PC-based CNC controls increased their processing speeds and gained more comprehensive control over the required functionality of all of the tools on the machine.
User friendly controls made it easier to train cutting system operators and easier to maintain consistency in the cutting operation.
Improved drives, motors, gearboxes, linear ways all contributed to the smoother motion, more accurate tracking, and high acceleration rates that improved the plasma cutting process.
Faster, more accurate torch height control systems optimized plasma torch performance with the proper pierce height and accurate real time cutting height.


Yet even with all of these plasma cutting process advancements, the same issues still remained with hole quality, even though taper, dings and divots were all less pronounced. In fact, recent surveys of long time plasma cutting equipment users showed that their number one process issue was hole quality.


1 2 next



Was this article informative for you? Please share your comments or thoughts here.

     
Comments

Posted by Rajagopalsamy Ramamurthy in Coimbatore, India
(04/01/10 - 12:27 PM)
True Hole technology
Information about cutting in Stainless steel would be useful as well as the mechanics involved in the hole cutting.



Posted by emhemd in Tripoli-Libya
(08/10/10 - 06:53 AM)
plasma new technology
I have 2 questions please: (1) Could the true hole technology make the same cutting quality of the holes that laser cutting technology make? (2) Is the cost of the plasma cutting machine with true hole technology less or more than the plasma machine without?

Jim Colt responds:
On your first question, can True Hole technology make the same cutting quality of the holes that laser cutting technology makes? This question is a little tough to answer. The True Hole technology is a plasma, not a laser . . . so expect some features of the cut to be better than a laser cut hole in plate, and expect some features to not be as good as laser. Also, not all lasers are equal, and not all motion control devices are equal . . . so True Hole mounted on a large, heavy gantry cutting machine may produce some differences in hole tolerances as compared to the same process mounted on a small, lightweight precision cutting machine . . . similar analogies can take place with laser/machine applications.

In a nutshell:
1. Hole roundness. Assuming good motion control on both laser and plasma machines . . . the top of a True Hole hole and a Laser hole should be dimensionally similar and perfectly round. In most cases the bottom of a laser hole will be quite round as well, with a few small anomalies that are often caused by top surface irregularities that may affect the beam. The True Hole plasma hole bottom will have similar, but slightly more pronounced irregularities on the bottom of the hole, however the process is designed to bias any anomalies to the outside of the hole, therefore maintaining the top to bottom hole dimensions so secondary hole cleanup is unnecessary for bolt insertion.

2. Hole taper. Both processes produce a slight amount of hole taper. The True Hole hole will have slightly more taper as compared to most lasers . . . however normal oversizing of holes for bolt clearance is usually adequate to ensure that the bottom dimension of the hole is within specifications. On a 1/2 in diameter hole in 1/2 in thick carbon steel plate . . . expect the bottom of a hole cut with a conventional plasma to be approximately .060 in to .100 in smaller than the top, with True Hole, expect the bottom of this same hole to be .010 in to .020 in smaller than the top, and with most C02 laser processes expect the bottom to be .005 in to .010 in smaller than the top. These numbers can vary from machine to machine, and after wear on plasma and laser consumable parts . . . but this is a good comparison of the process capabilities.

3. Hole edge roughness, metallurgy. Plasma usually produces the smoothest inside edge quality on a hole in carbon steel, and there is minimal hardening (although this varies depending on the grade of steel) as the True Hole process uses oxygen as the plasma gas as well as oxygen as the shield gas ?? this gas combination effectively keeps the nitrogen content in ambient air away from the cut edge, minimizing the nitride hardening of the edge. Initial metallurgy stress tests performed on True Hole holes shows promising results, and may allow plasma cut holes to be incorporated into primary bridge structural components, an area previously reserved for drilled or punched holes. Most Laser cut holes in plate have high surface roughness, and are often not allowed for this type of application.

4. Cut speed. Plasma wins hands down with the ability to pierce 1 in plate in less than a second, and cut speeds that are 2 times to 4 times that of laser cut holes on plate thicknesses above 1/4 in.

On your second question, is the cost of the plasma cutting machine with True Hole technology less or more than a plasma machine without? The True Hole process utilizes newer technology in the Plasma power supply, the CNC control, The torch height control system, as well as the CAM nesting software. These are all of the same components that are required on any high definition class mechanized plasma cutting system. The cost of a new system with True Hole technology is essentially the same as the cost of a new system with high definition plasma cutting technology.

Thanks again for your questions. Jim